Why Telepathy is Natural Evolution

The advancement of human rights depends on it.

Hundreds of millions of years ago, tetrapods were in the process of evolving from being fish in water to being fish out of water, animals that could survive and reproduce on land. This remarkable transformation, a metamorphosis from breathing and moving when immersed in liquid to survival on the ground above was a profound event in evolution.

It took some time. At some point in the process, a tetrapod would have possessed marginal, half-formed appendages and internal mechanisms that would have seemed to have had no defined function.

If only that tetrapod knew that one day her descendant would be on a distant moon saying, “That’s one small step…”

Life on earth is still evolving, including of course the human species. Today, incredible advances in genomic research allow scientists the privilege of tracking subtle shifts across populations. For example, British people from Roman times to now are getting taller and fairer; babies with fractionally bigger heads need mothers with incrementally wider hips to deliver those babies.

The brain, consciousness and psychic abilities all play a legitimate role in the higher evolution of communication and human rights. It’s just that currently we’re like the tetrapod having a half-formed foot that seemingly does what?

Mental or psychic phenomena covers an extensive gamut of claims and is broadly included in what is termed the paranormal. Unfortunately, the field attracts its fair share of fraudsters and charlatans. Scientific rigor has not caught up with the avalanche of anecdotal evidence. But there continue to be exciting developments concerning the mind and consciousness.

Modern-day imaging is revealing a center in the brain that may be acting as an antenna. Some verified out of body, near death experiences are very compelling.

A gold standard of scientifically accepted bizarre is the famous double-slit experiment in quantum mechanics which includes evidence of consciousness playing a role as “the observer” in creating reality. Modern medicine acknowledges the existence of the placebo effect.

There has been enough inexplicable strangeness to prompt scientific studies by governments trying to isolate and weaponize extrasensory perception, or remote viewing. The CIA was onto it decades ago and intelligence suggested the Russians were well advanced in psychic studies. Countless independent researchers, some of whom have spent over 40 years conducting controlled experiments, conclude that statistically unequivocally, something weird is definitely up with the mind.

It’s also important to recognize that any government openly admitting the talent is real presents massive security implications. Non local abilities in consciousness are, in effect, available to anyone and uncontrolled. There are compelling imperatives to deny its existence and present a first wall of cultural information that ESP is “pseudoscience.”

Dig deeper into mountains of wide-ranging studies in the “paranormal” going back over a century and you see it’s exactly the opposite, including a Nobel prize winner who was a laughing, arch-skeptic who instead had his automatic response dramatically challenged in the distantly related field of mediumship.

For the most part, no-one knows exactly how to tame these disparate talents; they’re elusive, and don’t seem to have a reliable, defined role in society, other than there’s something real going on.

If you’re willing to get your fractionally larger head around the concept that you’re like a tetrapod transitioning, then read on. Because there’s a logical reason why the evolution of non-verbal communication profoundly advances human and civil rights.

Communication has steadily evolved, from your distant ancestor thumping a colleague on the back then clubbing him in the head when he turns, to you at dinner last week saying, “Excuse me, could you please pass the pommes puree?”

The #MeToo movement includes mainly (but not exclusively) women sharing vulnerable experiences of sexual harassment, assault, and discrimination, to protest, to raise awareness, and to offer solidarity against entrenched unfairness. It serves as an excellent communication model, demonstrating how at our point in evolution, language enslavement is currently at the heart of civil rights.

When The New York Times reported on the pornographic actress Stormy Daniel’s interview on ’60 Minutes’, where she discussed an affair with Donald Trump, the paper said, ‘Even more, as the subject turned to threats, payoffs and nondisclosure agreements, the interview became about power, the ability of wealthy men to pay, pressure or coerce women into silence… It’s about who gets to decide when their stories get told and under what terms.’

When anyone’s voice, their language, becomes a captive commodity, the corollary is just a different type of slavery. The denial of fundamental rights is a grave ethical travesty; the victim by definition is more often than not an anonymous, basic human whose freedom is disallowed.

Life hasn’t got to the stage yet of people owning and selling you all the air you breathe, but it’s reached the point of purchasing or denying you the words from your voicebox.

An ultimate arbiter of laws today, the leviathan legal system, has been entirely constructed around those who can successfully re-interpret, manipulate, mislead, twist and own the language and is open to phantasmagoric inconsistencies in dispensing “justice.” Even though some lawyers work selflessly to offer the disadvantaged a voice in this arena, the legal system works symbiotically with wealth, particularly in civil cases.

How often do we hear that it’s futile running a valid civil case against someone with vast financial resources? They can stretch their defense out, even if they are entirely at fault, their team of lawyers hired to talk forever and bury you in paperwork. All your assets may be threatened until you have no more money left. The goal is to slowly wrap a python around your neck and throttle your voice.

The power that money exerts in abetting rights abuses, in perpetuating them, in making stories vanish, is prodigious because it’s currently possible on this planet for language to be seized by the highest bidder. If someone owns the words of the abuse, the way we communicate it, they can manacle those words in a dungeon and throw away the keys.

Casualties of abuse who come forward face a wall of aggressive words. They could also face threats of counter lawsuits. There are people whose paid goal getting up in the morning and contributing value to the earth is smearing, discrediting, lying, and ruining victims of abuse who dare speak about it.

Sufferers often face impossible choices. The courts don’t want you, they want you to accept a payout. Money for silence is officially sanctioned and encouraged as appropriate abuse resolution. You also don’t have the resources to compete with the wealthier person who abused you.

But accepting a payout, shutting up, and disappearing, doesn’t help the next innocent. You’re being forced to look the other way. And if you do accept payment, you can be depicted as an extortionist.

You’re in this mess because your rights are tied up in words; endless talk, lies, empty promises, policies, and assurances which are open and vulnerable to prostitution more than they can protect you.

Dominant institutions love nothing more than trumpeting politically correct policy; they’re often giddy about it. But civil rights linked to words fosters phony appearances, all show, and no go.

The more words, the better. If they have five million pages of policy, the bigger the mountain of paper, the more opportunity in a vast labyrinth to defend.

Next time your spouse asks you to take their mother shopping, present them with a 1,500-page policy document outlining the fair treatment of mother-in-laws. Tell them to get back to you with the appropriate sub-clause to discuss further. Later that month announce that you’re working diligently to expand that 1,500-page document into a 10,000-page manifesto because you care so much about their mother.

At some point, they’ll give up.

Matt Lauer, the long-time host of The Today Show in the United States, was sacked for sexual misconduct. The lawyer for the woman who’d made the complaint said: “I am in awe of the courage my client showed to be the first to raise a complaint and to do so without making any demands other than the company do the right thing.”

But getting powerful individuals or companies to “do the right thing” is an almost impossible task.

When we are little, we are led to believe that fundamental human rights are available and straightforward, non-negotiable and that a society is distinguished, as Abraham Lincoln dreamed, “of the people, by the people, for the people.” The truth is society has evolved to a top 1% of the wealth in a mad scramble to the top of a power pyramid, who see subverting rights as inevitable collateral damage while competing in that race.

The unpalatable truth about “doing the right thing” is that corporations, institutions, “the system,” has perfected the dark art of enabling abuse; of denial, covering up, of looking the other way, of turning the victim into the enemy and shutting them up. Shutting them up means seizing the language of that abuse. Ultimately a defenseless person cedes their words.

When degrading someone, it’s done in quiet, when defending the crime, it’s taking away the innocent’s language.

Harvey Weinstein, the corpulent Hollywood producer with a string of Oscar successes, allegedly harassed and molested women going back decades in a vacuum of complicit corporate (including industry) silence.

When an article about Weinstein appeared in The New York Times, it was stated that; “The human resources department was seen by many as protecting Mr. Weinstein more than his employees.” When the New York attorney general launched a lawsuit against Weinstein, he alleged that even though the company had ample opportunity to halt Weinstein’s behavior, they simply failed to do so. “…not only did they fail to stop it, they enabled it and covered it up.”

A cover-up is strategic, communication subterfuge.

The actress Uma Thurman commented about dangerous on set practices as well as sexual harassment in Hollywood that the real villains, the ‘wicked conspirators’ were a group of complicit people involved in a cover-up, ‘They lied, destroyed evidence, and continue to lie…’

By the time of Matt Lauer’s sacking, his career had stretched 25 years of high ratings and profits for NBC. The cause of his termination “may not have been an isolated incident.”

In the case of former USA team doctor Larry Nassar, accused of desecrating methods on at least 250 young female gymnasts, his actions spanned back to 1992 with institutions such as Michigan State in full knowledge of multiple complaints. Had the “business imperatives” of the university enabled a predator?

I can attest from personal experience that the administrative conduct in these high profile cases is not unusual.

At the start of this decade, I found myself with many other innocents affected, in my opinion, by corruption and noxious civil rights abuses by management at Monash University, the largest university in Australia. Complaints to the administration resulted in them utilizing every ploy in the well-thumbed dirty-trick playbook for over 18 months to deny, cover-up, act confused, bully, fatigue, get me to give up, as I attempted to persuade them to “do the right thing.”

In a clichéd scene, they eventually admitted wrongdoing and a telescopically unfolding arm slid a financial offer across a large meeting table for me to consider, so I could sign a nondisclosure agreement and dematerialize. I pushed it back.

“Doing the right thing” seemed impossible for them. So instead, I tried to get civil rights violations registered against a billion-dollar business, to make a real difference. It’s like galloping on your unicorn straight into a meat grinder.

Finally, they sacked the cabal of dodgy managers, but to get there, the behavior of the administration, HR, their legal team, was more shameless and disgraceful, in my opinion, than the perpetrators.

This is no surprise. After all, Monash promotes itself as in the top 1% of universities in the world.

In their fundamental approach, no different to the people in power at The Weinstein Company, no different to those at NBC, to Michigan State, no different to CBS looking the other way with the “behavior that has been ignored and covered up for decades” of former CEO Les Moonves.

Whether you’re trying to raise a straightforward complaint, or succeed in court, it all gets down to who controls the language.

In evolution, earthlings are currently at a half-way house where competition for ownership of words is fierce. Donald Trump, for example, seems to have a philosophy whereby saying anything, wilfully forces it into belief, existence, and makes it real. The mainstream news media are portrayed by him as the enemy of the people, spreading information that is “fake news.”

The population is more and more confused by words, finding it harder than ever to decipher what is real to them and what is not. Some see an abysmal disintegration of essential values, like speaking the truth.

There’s a silver lining to that.

It means the value of words will start to decrease. It also encourages more of a mental workout, searching for what feels right, reading between the lines. An evolutionary harbinger would be a continued shift from forming beliefs based on what we are told, and more to what we intuit.

If evolution is doing its job correctly, words will one day become worthless as a trade commodity to barter, seize, mold and control concerning human rights. Who gets to have a voice, to shape the narrative, will not favor the person or institution with the most wealth or the most power.

Language can still have a role because who doesn’t love lyrics, but communication will evolve to include elementary forms of telepathy.

It doesn’t have to be mental powers that rain flaming bottles smashing down on your neighbor with your mind, levitating his barking dog and spinning it a hundred feet in the air. Nor does it need to be a read everyone’s personal thoughts kind of telepathy — it just needs to reach a point where the emotional intent of someone is clear.

If the emotional intent of anyone is naked, the defenseless, disadvantaged person will be more protected. Verbal lies to achieve an agenda will have no sanctuary. Hiding behind 10,000 pages of policy will be futile. Employing a phalanx of lawyers will be a waste of time.

The ethics of society will be agreed and upholding these values more straightforward. With this advancement, the current paradigm of entrenched discrimination and abuse will melt back, and ultimately society will be elevated and transformed.

Communication today can include a powerful exchange of pure emotion. There’s also gut feelings, intuition, hunches, reading the body language and demeanor of others — non-verbal clues, many other things.

If evolution is doing what I suspect, then as a species we should be more sophisticated and sensitive to non-verbal cues today than our distant ancestors. Words were okay, but what’s in progress is a fairer, more efficient model in the making.

Most reasonable people want to contribute to a better planet. There is a real reward today for the average person to take an interest in their psychic development. It’s simple and has massive, positive ramifications for future freedom and equality.

Rather than concentrating on words at face value, try to focus on intuiting emotional intent. Peer at the purpose behind words, including this article. Practice on your infant child when they flutter their long eyelashes at you, even a five-minute training session here and there will make a difference.

There’s also an imperative for those that rely on the power and control of words, the slave drivers, to oppose it and say it’s all bunk. My hunch is that more and more fractionally bigger headed babies are going to be born with intuitive abilities. Perhaps your grandchild, thanks to your workouts with their parent.

The success of a society, species or individual won’t be a reflection of how many attained membership at the top 1% of the pyramid; kicking everyone else in the face to get there. A flourishing society will be measured by how emotionally healthy the entire collective is, whatever they do. It will be in your best interest that everyone is feeling well because how they feel, affects everyone. The pyramid will be inverted.

The preservation of respect and dignity of all people, the protection of those who are defenseless, is a marker of a society’s advancement.

If there are intelligent species out there in the cosmos, thousands or millions of years more advanced than us, then stories of them utilizing telepathy makes perfect, logical, evolutionary sense. They have superseded the inherent inequalities of spoken language.

For us, the day when the emotional strategy of anyone is clear to all will be a profound leap forward, just as significant as our ancestors, the tetrapods, transitioning to land.

If that far away day of clarity arrives, there will be no more manipulating and enslaving language. Words of the vulnerable, the simple building blocks of how we connect, will no longer be auctioned or erased, nor the motives of the powerful disguised. Those who hide behind or twist words endlessly and expensively in semantic strategies of denial, confusion, manipulation, and power will be flushed out.

The legal profession often yakkity-yak about reform. Real reform will have arrived. They’ll all be out of work.

Essential freedoms in that time “shall not perish from the earth” but flourish. With luck, our air will still be free, our thoughts and feelings, truth.

Evolution will have worked it out.