Re-writing Earth’s origin story is serious business.
WARNING: Reading this article will undermine your social and career aspirations.
On October 29, 2019, an innocuous book launch took place, not covered by any mainstream media. It was Book 2 (‘Man’) of a three-part book series ‘Gods, Man & War.’
‘Gods’ was the title of the first book in the trilogy, published in March 2018. The third, ‘War’ is expected to be released in 2021.
All three are promoted as “non-fiction.”
Why should you care about this? You’ve got so many other things to worry about.
For starters there’s a global pandemic (straight out of science fiction); set decorating your house for video calls, finding the next television show to binge-watch, insane politics, what’s for dinner, the dog just escaped with the 2-year-old on top…
So many distractions.
But you should care, because in the pages of this multi-volume book, ‘Gods, Man & War’ is the playbook, hidden in plain sight, of how the American defense establishment, the most powerful entity on earth, plans to re-shape the origin story of your species (that’s you) and shift entrenched beliefs of billions of people.
In 1949, George Orwell authored a famous dystopian novel titled ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four.’ His words then are prescient today: “Who controls the past… controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”
For the USA, owning an updated version of events assists them neutralise advancing global threats, including a game-plan for China and religious obstacles, maintaining American supremacy into the next century.
That’s the plan.
This is about propaganda at its most distilled, about geopolitical manoeuvring and about existential menaces that don’t just include the collapse of superpowers, but the possible extinction of our species. It’s about science versus religion, capitalism versus communism, it’s about freedom, human rights, and reality itself.
And there are Nazis.
When I was in film school the joke was that provocative student movies were guaranteed to centre around one of religion, sex, or Nazis. A fellow student raised the bar and made a film that year titled ‘Hot Nazi Homos’ with a sex scene on a church altar.
What you’re about to read has religion, sex, and Nazis, but is even more assaulting, kooky, and seditious than a student film, so you’ve been warned.
“… based on unprecedented access to officials at the highest levels of government, military and industrial agencies who have provided insights and assistance never before experienced by any researchers in this controversial field… beyond speculation to certain knowledge of what exactly lies at the heart of the most important Phenomenon ever to confront human understanding.”
“The reader will not discover wild theories or unfounded claims, but instead will confront a solid — if often unsettling — reality…”
The company that created the three parts of ‘Gods, Man & War’ is ‘To The Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences’ (TTSA) who on its website proclaims that it is made up of “the most experienced, connected and passionately curious minds from the US intelligence community, including the CIA and the Department of Defense.”
In a world based on competition and power, those bona fides originate from the biggest dogs on the planet. That’s why you should take this seriously, no matter how things start to unravel.
On the surface, the company presents as being led by two men; one a decades-long CIA veteran of strategic intelligence, Jim Semivan, once chief of covert operations domestic, and the other a former punk rock star and UFO enthusiast Tom DeLonge, whose presence seems to be all about marketing.
DeLonge himself says, “I’ve been brought into a group of people and I’m a big part of a mechanism that is absolutely profound and [has] already started changing the world. And it’s going to do a lot more.”
Semivan tells us that the trilogy of TTSA books present, “The story of the millennium.” He stresses that “‘Gods’ ‘Man’ and ‘War’ is essential to what we’re doing.”
What they’re doing is unveiling a secret “truth” to the public, that for thousands of years more advanced foreign intelligence(s), or straight-up weird phenomena, are real and have been engaging humanity.
This declaration comes with major strategic, geopolitical, religious, cultural, and existential ramifications.
If you think Apple Computers working on a gala event to announce a new product line-up is micro-managed to within a millimetre of its life, or even your local café agonising over the launch of a new menu, USA global positioning and long-term survival are bigger stakes.
This is not simply about “aliens” zooming in tan cans from the other side of the galaxy, realising one of them forgot to stack the refrigerator. It’s that some other intelligent aspect to reality interacts with the human race in some kind of coordinated dance.
Regarding those occasional flashing lights in the sky, they’ve even swapped the acronym from UFO to UAP, to make it all about Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.
Inexplicable phenomena or a phenomenon — that’s the new focus.
It’s long been speculated that this interaction has been going on for all of human history.
There are theories that fairies, elves, ghosts, aliens, clairvoyance, physical mediumship, out of body and near-death experiences may all be aspects of the same phenomenon reaching out to interact with humanity, viewed through varying cultural and experiential lenses.
And if there are more advanced species, they have pierced that veil as well, and operate within that reality.
The TTSA books focus heavily on ancient religious encounters, for a very big reason.
Is it true, or is it all baloney?
You’ll have to decide for yourself.
(In this article I’ll use both UFO and the Phenomenon interchangeably.)
It’s been said that the secrecy surrounding government knowledge about UFO reality has been the most tightly controlled operation in history, surpassing the development of the atomic bomb.
You’ve been led to believe by United States intelligence interests, establishment media, and Wikipedia, that the subject is all a joke, populated by frauds, gullible people, the mentally ill, or just plain idiots.
That’s called gaslighting.
Ridiculing others has been preferable for a superpower rather than volunteering they’ve got no control over their airspace, their defence installations are impotent, or they can’t guarantee the safety of their citizens.
But now a new story is being spun. And it’s a complete flip.
To an extent, the U.S. seems forced into this, so the key questions are why, and why now?
The reveal, if it has to be done, must be spun to their advantage.
If the biggest secret of all-time (plus possibly another bombshell) is being given the stamp of approval, it’s being executed like the frog getting boiled alive; step by step, until the frog doesn’t even realise it’s cooked.
The frog is you.
The gas on the stove was turned up a notch when TTSA publicly materialised in 2017.
Besides Semivan and DeLonge, notable members of TTSA at the launch included Christopher Mellon, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence; Luis Elizondo, a counter-intelligence expert said to be a former director of a secret Pentagon UFO study program; Steve Justice, former head of U.S. military defense contractor Lockheed Martin Skunkworks, and Hal Puthoff, a physicist with a storied career researching parapsychology for the U.S. intelligence community.
As DeLonge categorised them, “These guys were the ones involved in the secretive U.S. government programs that dealt with these subjects.”
Semivan has admitted (and the books give mention in their forewords) that there’s a much larger group behind the scenes, referred to as “the advisers.”
TTSA’s image at launch was of recently retired U.S. defense establishment whistle-blowers wanting to lift the lid on UFOs, acting in the interests of the entire globe.
This rebels-without-borders humanitarian ideal was plain on their website at launch:
“The team members all share a common thread of frustration and determination to disrupt the status quo, wanting to use their expertise and credibility to bring transformative science and engineering out of the shadows and collaborate with global citizens to apply that knowledge in a way that benefits humanity.
Without the restrictions of government priorities.” (Their bold formatting.)
Coming from impeccable U.S. patriots, some who had been in theatres of war willing to die for America, most possessing active security clearances, including CIA veterans, projecting a rebels-without-borders mantra was more implausible than UFOs themselves.
Nevertheless, that was the marketing message at the launch. It created separation from the U.S. government to generate attention.
This “public benefit” company immediately entwined with breathless mainstream announcements in December 2017 that the U.S. government had been secretly studying UFOs. Those stories came with U.S. Navy videos snatched with a hint of subterfuge, allegedly by TTSA, from within the U.S. Department of Defense, showing aerial vehicles that the most sophisticated military tracking systems couldn’t identify.
But was it really a few globalist rebels and “whistle-blowers” orchestrating it, two steps ahead of a clueless, inept, most powerful country on the planet? (A superpower of such efficiency it had constructed an unbreakable coverup prior.)
Was there really now a few deserters randomly setting the agenda on a disclosure with such massive domestic and planetary ramifications?
Eighteen months before TTSA appeared, a candid DeLonge in an early radio interview referred to how crucial the creation of plausible deniability was to strategists within the U.S. government as a company he was involved in would bring once-secret information into public consciousness.
We saw this strategy play out early on with Pentagon spokespeople denying or disputing TTSA details, maintaining separation, some personnel quite probably in the dark.
TTSA quickly became defined more by what they held back than what they revealed; heavily stage-managed and protected, agile, hard to pin down, nebulous, shape-shifters.
They behaved exactly as a public relations pathfinder acting in the interests of the most intimidating superpower on the planet, one with a stupendous agenda, would act. Opposing official U.S. policy on the subject, in order to win traction with the public, would be a critical part of their assignment.
But real whistle-blowers don’t shape-shift.
They come out with the whole truth and nothing but the truth — and stick to it regardless of the consequences. They go charging into the meat grinder on their unicorns.
TTSA on the other hand, in the fine tradition of shape-shifting, eventually recast ther rebels-without-borders persona with a tweet:
“TTSA has been transparent & vocal since inception about the fact that a cooperative relationship with both U.S. Government & private industry is essential to the success & forward movement of our steadfast mission.”
TTSA reminds me of a soldier in the Vietnam War, the one out front of the platoon, searching for the deadly tripwire and clearing the way for a whole army to follow. Behind TTSA, carefully trailing them through the thick undergrowth is comms, The New York Times, and other establishment media. Further behind them, the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA.
The looming, precious cargo at the rear, being shepherded forward through the jungle, is the United States of America.
For something as intricately planned as this announcement, the country itself is not afforded unexpected mistakes out front and image do-overs.
TTSA is expendable if things go awry. A group that can be disavowed if need be. Or in a spy novel, the secret agent abandoned on the frozen tundra if plans change.
The U.S. choosing a whistleblower strategy is logical. It creates the facade of people-power, ownership of the topic to the citizenry, that democracy is alive and well, that anyone can storm the citadel and force profound changes. It also allows the Pentagon to control their drip feed of admissions — by responding at their own planned pace to public demands that they are orchestrating themselves.
More recently, coinciding with Democrat Joseph R. Biden’s presidential victory, three pivotal members left TTSA, and the future mission of the organisation is clouded, but more of that later.
Up to now, TTSA has continually shape-shifted as it surveyed the terrain.
Early on, DeLonge’s position in the limelight was dramatically scaled back, as if a hey-dude rebel image wasn’t polling well, creating more negatives than positives regarding credibility.
The more serious-faced “retired” government insiders were shuffled forward because more gravitas was required.
From there came a succession of careful statements and interviews testing the mood and reaction of the world, judging just how far public disbelief extended.
A couple of the more notable comments were — Christopher Mellon, who had worked under the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations saying ominously, “These things are real, they’re here, this is happening now.” And Luis Elizondo remarkably conceding in 2019 on a Fox News television interview that America had crash materials from a downed UFO.
The world began receiving similar from a few angles.
Harvard University astrophysicist and top astronomer Avi Loeb appeared everywhere with his belief (and eventually a new book) that aliens may have visited our part of the solar system.
Even highly respected former space security chief of Israel, Haim Eshed, declared in December 2020 that there is a galactic federation and humans are working with aliens on Mars.
These accumulating statements have more resembled Maxwell Smart from the iconic 1960s television show ‘Get Smart’ saying, “Would you believe…?”
With the alien reveal, the public has been constantly challenged to make judgements on what is true, what is possible, and what is not.
For example, when Eshed made his remarks, NASA exploratory rover Perseverance was about to land on Mars and drill for microscopic signatures of life that would take a decade to return to earth for analysis.
CIA veteran Jim Semivan says, “The phenomena is real. You can’t deny the existence of UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena), or the existence of some of this phenomena that exists, whether it’s ESP, clairvoyance, we know these things are real.”
Just so you’re keeping up, it would be fair to ask Semivan his opinion on why The New York Times has been dissuaded over the last hundred years or so from running a headline declaring, “Telepathy is Real. Enjoy.” (Just so you know, one day it’s coming.)
This massive reversal isn’t happening without a meticulously planned, larger game-plan.
When part 2 of the book series, ‘Man’ was released at the end of October 2019, a video recording was made of a small signing event, with CIA vet Semivan and Tom DeLonge making statements and taking questions, along with author Peter Levenda.
The main theme could not have been any clearer.
The word “religion” is mentioned close to 30 times, along with “Gods,” ”angels,” “Moses,” “Abraham,” “miracles,” “the Bible,” “biblical texts,” “the Torah,” “Aztecs,” “Mayans,” “mythology,” “ancient Chinese,” “ancient religions,” “burning bushes,” “voices,” “creation myths,” “esoteric cults,” “cargo cults,” “supernatural forces” — it’s all there and Peter Levenda is highlighted as the perfect choice to be the author because he has an MA in religious studies.
Levenda says, “What’s the first time anybody ever talked about the phenomena? It was in the context of religion.” He points out that first there’s an event, often a supernatural event, then religious mythology is constructed around that event.
The TTSA books present an overarching hypothesis that “all religions are UFO religions,” that there’s uniformity in ancient mythology of celestial interventions.
DeLonge’s testimony details him urging factions within the U.S. government to be open about UFOs, to use that as a geopolitical strategy to dismantle religion.
DeLonge says, “We came at it from an ancient religions point of view. That got everything started. If I didn’t have that I wouldn’t have got in the door. What that did was it basically summed up our way in — and this particular person said, ‘That’s the right way in, and now let’s have a real discussion.’”
What coalesced was a big picture goal for the Department of Defense admitting UFO reality to the public and over time dismantling the monotheistic religions and ultimately religious roadblocks geopolitically.
As we will discover, this also includes a strategy against rising communist threat China.
Whether DeLonge recruited the U.S. Defense establishment, or vice versa, is still contentious.
Many see DeLonge as the “useful idiot” stereotype, a conduit for younger generations who have a natural distrust of government. DeLonge would turn them around, painting U.S. secret-keepers as heroic.
Supporting a hypothesis of DeLonge employed as an image; when the first book ‘Gods’ was launched in 2018, the cover credit was “By Tom DeLonge,” and underneath, “with Peter Levenda.” At the launch of the second book ‘Man,’ DeLonge openly admitted he didn’t write the trilogy. This mea culpa reflected his ever-diminishing public status.
However, DeLonge still claims the religious revolution scheme is his: “And that was my pitch to the early advisers, is the big fire that’s roaring, the wars that we’re fighting, or the wars in the Middle East. We can try and go there and tackle that flame all day long but if you don’t get to the root of the flame, the fuel that’s burning the fire, which is who we are, and where did we come from, and our different belief systems about that — I think that will change.”
We can never be entirely sure what DeLonge is willing to take credit for or not. He accepts having his name emblazoned on books he doesn’t write. He says that author Levenda was the one who gave him the idea that religions were a cargo cult. (In other words, it was Levenda’s idea.) “The cargo cult thing was the perfect thing to sum up man’s history,” DeLonge says.
The grand scope of the TTSA books, according to DeLonge, is to present “themes about the human race and themes to change the world.”
DeLonge’s initial role in TTSA seemed to be to sow public awareness of the wilder aspects of the earth origin story, and to his credit he courageously came in swinging. But the effect was miscalculated. He appeared on the popular Joe Rogan podcast in October 2017 right when TTSA was launching and the general perception was that he didn’t appear credible.
From there it was a steady march to the bench.
Even though the general public wasn’t ready, (and still isn’t), what DeLonge has always said appears to be the blueprint.
The books make it very clear.
They read like a pitch for a B or C grade science fiction movie. But remember, TTSA has had The New York Times, The Washington Post, the CIA, the Department of Defense, high-level insiders, and others behind them since day one on a slow-burn, big picture plan.
Way out there, kept from the mainstream for now, the TTSA working theory is that human beings since creation have been deliberately kept in conflict with one another to fragment and weaken us as a group. That there is a control system in place regarding our evolution.
Who does this?
Celestial visitors who created us do.
The books argue that humans need to rise and break the shackles, revolt against our creator(s), come together, cast off religious interpretations formed mistakenly in the distant past that have only encouraged conflict and wars.
The books argue that aliens with evil agendas birthed the human race and have been manipulating humans throughout history, specifically our DNA. (That’s the sex bit you were waiting for. You’ve had religion. Nazis not far away.)
The argument is that humans have never controlled their destinies, or had agency of their own. Religious mythology although respected should be reinterpreted for the modern age.
The books suggest that the creators have been responsible for genocide, weeding out DNA that’s feisty and resistant to manipulation.
TTSA is keen to posit that any fair-haired, blue-eyed, Nordic-looking aliens influenced the Nazis. These arch-villains loom to figure prominently in Book 3 ‘War.’ Author Peter Levenda’s best known prior book was about “esoteric Hitlerism.” All roads appear to lead to the Antarctic.
Stretching back further than the Nazis, TTSA suggests that even the great flood of Genesis was part of an orchestrated genocide.
And so, overall, TTSA promotes the concept of threats to humanity.
It bears highlighting that in TTSA’s interpretation of genocide, it’s a guided evolution towards defective, susceptible, easily manipulated, and gullible humans. (TTSA may want this evolution to work for their agenda as well.)
Apparently, the little grey aliens, so widespread in popular culture are very real, are not nice, and they’re a fusion of biology and technology, emotionless cyborgs. Either a standalone species or created by a progenitor race.
How many species of aliens out there is anyone’s guess. That will become important if we’re told some are allegedly hostile and others are allegedly friendly.
In other media, a narrative has been emerging of very tall beings arriving from Mars, escaping a cataclysmic event that eviscerated that planet in our pre-history.
Considering how much TTSA is relying on ancient religious mythologies, (including Adam and Eve with the devious snake), it’s more than an even money bet that the unveiling of the ultimate “evil aliens” will highlight their reptile DNA.
They’ve had such a bad rap.
The TTSA books are the architectural blueprint.
Semivan, the long-time CIA heavy hitter says, “These books are foundational for TTSA. Because they explain what most of us believe. That we have to have a look at religion, we have to look at science, and we have to look at the history of man.”
TTSA’s message is that the aliens have always tampered with and controlled humans, setting us against one another.
They deliberately drop technology which humans run out like gophers to retrieve, the aliens hoping we will engineer better weaponry to use on one another. There’s even a scaremongering angle of the greys being soulless, (of course) like an emotionless hive, harvesting human genetic material.
DeLonge has hinted at a concept of the aliens snatching human souls.
(All this is unfortunately reminiscent of how any racist agenda categorises another group as sub-human parasites.)
TTSA is not just making something up out of nothing. They are mining existing religious mythology and re-booting it.
If we follow religious threads, we arrive back at the times of the “fallen angels” who appear in the Christian stories of Genesis, who came from the sky, don’t play nice, interbred with humans, and constantly tempt people to sin. They allegedly introduced ways to use metals, as shields and armour, and taught humans how to kill.
This doesn’t just align with the movie ‘2001: A Space Odyssey,’ where an alien monolith marks the moment an ape is inspired to crack the skull of an opponent with a bone. It aligns with the small fragments of UFO crash materials that TTSA tells us they’re gathering today and studying, even suggesting the metals appear to have been dropped on purpose. (Nice tie-in.)
Fallen angels can be accused of cascading chains of depraved human behaviour; encouraging women to discover cosmetics, jewellery, and provocative seductive ways which in turn cause men to uncontrollably lust after women, leading to rampant social corruption. It’s why some religious practices countered by preferring women cover their appearances.
Even a recent New York Times report of fighter pilots encountering a small craft that zipped between their planes and “looked like a flying sphere, encasing a cube” harkens back to ancient Hindu and Buddhist iconography of a mandala.
As a public relations pathfinder over these three years, TTSA has worked at three distinct levels.
At the furthermost, TTSA’s “non-fiction” book series ‘Gods, Man & War’ has been kept in a much lower profile as it seeded awareness of the sweeping “earth origin story” to areas of the public that could absorb it straight-up.
(For those interested in further study, the emerging American propaganda appears to lean heavily on John A. Keel’s 1970 groundbreaking and seminal book on UFO investigation, ‘Operation Trojan Horse,’ which is recommended reading.)
At a second level, TTSA sourced and supervised the key content and provided on-screen talent for television shows such as ‘Unidentified: Behind America’s UFO Investigation’ on History, a U.S. cable channel. This is the middle ground, putting out information less sweeping than the books, but still ahead of mainstream news.
The image of TTSA on ‘Unidentified’ is that of a team on a breaking investigation as if their books don’t even exist. They stage-manage and recreate stumbling on the exact fundamental, existential question which they answer elsewhere. Are we alone?
Occasionally they’ll toss in something so out of left field it appears to be the deliberate prepping of the public for a future revelation. (There’s surely intelligence agency lingo for this.)
In the final episode of their first season, the title was exactly that: ‘The Revelation.’ It aired in June 2019, and in it, the team presented beliefs from senior Italian military officials (plausible deniability has many levels; Italians as well as Israeli space chiefs) that UFOs shoot electro-magnetic, directed energy weapons.
These weapons, we’re told, can be fired from under the sea, that UFOs must “de-cloak” and become visible as they shoot, and that this type of weapon can make surrounding, untargeted structures burst into “spontaneous fires.”
Keep that paragraph in your memory for retrieval later. There will be a test.
Thirdly, TTSA has spent time front and centre with their key personnel interviewed by establishment news outlets, holding the wider public’s hand. Here it’s not “certain knowledge,” nor manipulative cyborg aliens shooting ray guns or abducting you to harvest your DNA, but instead the most basic sanitised version.
Here, any speculation of ET is strictly prohibited.
Put simply, TTSA’s message in the mainstream is we should try and figure out what these strange things in the sky are — because they appear to be real. Is it the Chinese? Is it the Russians? We should find out. This could be a threat.
The fact that TTSA promotes an extensive evil alien narrative in their “non-fiction” book series, that the United States has been up to its neck in evidence, investigations, theories, and conclusions, stretching back extensively to at least the 1940s, is completely siphoned out at the mainstream level.
The disconnect is that on FOX News, TTSA’s Chris Mellon says they have no working theory, yet on the cable show ‘Unidentified’, his working theory is so refined, he can imply aliens may be using triangle shaped UFOs to aid in accuracy of terrain mapping, specifically via triangulation of data points.
Because a hierarchy of news organisation credibility has been constructed in our culture, it allows TTSA to say more expansive things in other media markets to seed awareness, but it won’t be accepted as “real” or astonishingly even exist as information at all by the average person until The New York Times runs it on the front page.
This calculated propaganda strategy has continual motion.
Truth mixed with speculation and disinformation seeded way out front, creating awareness of concepts, some considered wild, softening the public up.
Eventually, the most respected establishment news outlets, and finally government entities like the Pentagon or the Navy, confirm the building blocks of “reality” from the rear.
All of a sudden, you’re no longer being told UFOs are a joke, or if you believed in them you should be shunned or locked up. Today you, (and equally stunned elected civilian representatives), are being told we really ought to take this subject seriously.
It’s quite shameless, those secret-keepers who led the cover-up and the gaslighting to now be claiming that the public needs to wake up.
Because the UFO issue is so globally significant, whoever controls TTSA’s strategy, (the “advisers”) with orders in envelopes that dissolve in a puff of smoke, appear to be a shadowy coalition of powerbrokers who plot the western world’s course on meta, existential issues that transcend election cycles, everyday governing, and the whim of the people.
NASA astronaut, the late Dr. Edgar Mitchell, the sixth person to walk on the moon, attempted for much of his later years to discover who these secret-keepers were, who kept classified information about the reality of other life in the cosmos not only from the world but from the elected civilian representatives of the USA itself, including some presidents.
Mitchell concluded: “Whatever activity is going on, to the extent that it is, a clandestine group, a quasi-government group, a quasi-private group, it is without any type, as far as I can tell, of high-level government oversight. And that is a great concern.”
UFO researcher and activist Dr. Steven Greer claimed in a 2013 interview that he was once informed by a U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee Chief Counsel, who had tried valiantly but unsuccessfully to penetrate to the identity of the group controlling the UFO secrecy, that they appeared to be “the varsity team of all black projects.”
Billionaire Robert Bigelow, an individual who has worked extensively as a Defense Intelligence Agency contractor researching UFOs and the paranormal (including with some TTSA cohort) admits ultimate secret keepers exist beyond the president of the USA.
“Not by any means do all presidents know, absolutely not. The community is extremely small, that actually really know where things are and what’s going on. Is really, really, really, really small.”
But supreme power-brokers behind democracy is not a surprise.
U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower in his farewell address in January 1961 told the world this was reality.
He understood there was conflict developing in who had the ultimate power and responsibility to guarantee the survival of the republic. Was it the citizenry themselves, or agencies created to protect the citizenry?
If true democracy is capable of inadvertently voting itself to destruction, who is to safeguard against that happening?
He warned of “the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
Simply put, if the ultimate protectors and guardians saw their jurisdiction as absolute, they could have reason to influence or even oppose official U.S. policy. This would explain why elected officials, including career public servants and presidents, can and have been kept in the dark about UFOs.
This power split had “grave implications,” Eisenhower said. There might be a point where key decision making would shift away from the citizenry and that: “We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”
But the reason for the existence of a diffuse, amorphous, impenetrable network of strategic global defence for the USA and its western world allies makes simple and logical sense. Especially when it involves existential philosophical and sociological matters and the stakes are win at all costs.
There’s every reason to accept that decisions that are ultimately responsible for western society’s fundamental survival at a meta sociological level rest across intelligence agencies, the military, and private corporations.
They are the ones who can afford to fund costly scientific research and then compartmentalise the information. There, secrets stamped as essential to national security can avoid freedom of information requests, governmental oversight, indeed the U.S. Constitution itself.
Ultimate secret-keepers are necessary to give the best chance of preventing national catastrophes (including self-inflicted) and also, importantly, to guarantee continuity of government and a foolproof workable network in a doomsday scenario.
They would have to view their role as honourable, not as a cartoon, moustache-twirling, evil-cabal. They would by necessity be a form of shadow government.
The debates would inevitably evolve at the extremes of “honour.”
When does the end justifying the means become immoral? If the goal is win at all costs and guaranteed survival, does morality exist? When does human miscalculation, greed, or self-interest corrupt the process? And how do they walk the tightrope between guardianship and genuine people power?
If after the Second World War there came undeniable proof that one or several other technologically advanced species were present on this planet, then the survival of the USA (and allies) at a meta, existential level moved beyond just the fear of nuclear war with the Soviet Union or containing communism.
If a greater potential threat has subsequently been proven, does the public ever get told? And if so, could there be a wider strategy tied to this disclosure?
In 2017, it appeared TTSA was the arrival of the secret-keepers’ public relations pathfinder.
Both the elected representatives of the citizenry as well as the citizenry themselves needed to be let in on a secret and educated.
This two-step plan is ongoing and critical; one targeting the average person in government and the other targeting the average person in the street. The former means manufacturing support for, and shepherding in, congressional hearings on the subject to legitimise it. The latter means seeding a cultural revolution.
The old strategies of secrecy, denials, and gaslighting are now counter-productive.
If a reveal has to occur, then key benefits in a cultural revolution regarding religion and humanity’s origins can be tied to a game-plan to target China, communism, as well as short-circuit the steady march of Islam.
Indeed Christianity is going to be taken down with it.
It’s important to note: no claims are being made that there is no supreme creator or ultimate life-force. This is not an atheistic revolution, and that’s key.
Here’s how it works against rising communist superpower China.
China has long been anti-organised religion. Atheism is inexorably tied to communism. The church, spiritual matters, or “superstition” have nothing to offer the state. In clamping down, China has frequently been accused of human rights violations, of late against Uyghur Muslims.
China would be happy if the United States strategy was marginalising religious beliefs, aiming to achieve a secular planet. But it’s more nuanced than that for the USA against China.
The U.S. doesn’t want a secular planet, devoid of the mysterious or spiritual.
The U.S. is going to promote and globally accept that “phenomena” some phenomenon, some mysterious force tied to consciousness that interacts with humans is real and has been around since pre-history. (Misinterpreted by ancients into false religious mythology.)
That’s a problem for communism and that’s a problem for China because they don’t want any of this “superstition” to be out of their control, let alone be proven “real.”
Linking to this is the rising profile and support for life-after-death studies.
Robert Bigelow, previously mentioned as a well-known contractor on previous Pentagon UFO and paranormal research, recently announced the formation of a new group seeking confirmation of life after death. Again, the public here is invited to contribute, not shut out, and lured in by big prize-money.
Life after death is not good news for China. Today, only a small minority of mainland China inhabitants believe in any life after death.
It’s something the Chinese leaders already struggle to control and reframe involving how Tibetans select their Dalai Lama.
The connection between the UFO phenomenon and life after death is unmistakable. Anyone who studies the topic of UFOs ends up in the same arena. This entanglement or motif emerges and recurs in a multiplicity of “alien” and UFO stories globally, that of encountering dead relatives or friends in a type of dream world or vision.
The TTSA books tip their hand on China, they spend quite some time praising the esoteric wisdom and underpinnings of not only ancient Chinese practices but those throughout Asia as a whole (including the mysteries of possible reincarnation).
That is, you were leaders centuries ago, re-embrace your heritage.
It’s also worth speculating that the USA’s anti-religion cultural revolution includes the recent surprising shift to de-criminalise marijuana and some psychedelics.
In the mid 1960s the United States forbade the manufacture and sale of psychedelic drugs and soon after hallucinogenic research was shut down.
Today, you’re welcome, and bring life after death and aliens with you.
But again, the hallucinogenic focus on strange aspects to consciousness and reality, even encountering other entities, challenges China’s atheist communist ideology. It will be interesting to see whether support disintegrates for researchers who publish articles highlighting negative long-term effects in comparison to an expected tsunami of supportive media stories.
Externally, the U.S. has long been mired in global religious-based conflicts that not only appear unresolvable but threaten the country’s stability long-term unless a major circuit breaker is introduced.
The historically Christian USA has labelled this a “war on terror.” (It’s also been a failed war on Islam.)
These conflicts are not winding down as some believe but instead have been spreading. The U.S. is actively engaged in eighty nations on six continents, fighting at an ever-expanding human and financial cost. This resource-sucking battle has fundamentally been rooted in competition, ways of life, and ways of belief.
As Islam flourishes, grows, and retains youth worldwide, Christianity is shrinking, arguably dying from self-inflicted wounds, unable to attract or keep its youth.
For the USA, it’s all very well to promote freedom of faith and worship, until a century or two down the road some rival faith outnumbers you and has you surrounded or overrun.
The USA not only has religious issues externally but internally as well.
Powerful liberal factions in the United States defence establishment surely worry that Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals are holding back and fracturing the long-term aspirations of the country.
Within the USA, it appears it’s got to the point of acceptance that Christianity will have to be sacrificed in order to bring down Islam and de-stabilise China.
Members of TTSA have often said that powerful factions of staunch Christians within the government are working to obstruct or block progress on UFO transparency. The reason for that is obvious. They can see where this is heading, their own faith is under attack.
More than ever the USA is deeply split ideologically, the gap widening. The world has seen the evidence of this problem in the recent U.S. presidential election.
Spun the right way, the issue of strange phenomena, life elsewhere in the cosmos, life after death, reinterpreting ancient religious beliefs can be a long-term game-plan to cauterise this widening chasm and solidify the USA, at home, and on the world stage.
A few other benefits for the U.S. in a UFO or alien reveal are justifying extensive weapons in space and addressing global warming.
Dr. Carol Rosin, the first woman to work as an aerospace executive, has long claimed that Dr. Wernher von Braun, the German rocketry scientist brought to America after World War 2 to work for NASA, warned her in 1974 about the weaponization of space.
She claims von Braun expressed there would be multiple levels of propaganda. First, it will be claimed that the weapons are needed against the Soviets. Then it will be terrorists or rogue nations; then asteroids, and that the final card will be a supposed ET menace, which she laughed off at the time.
It might be where all those missing, unaccounted for trillions have disappeared over generations in USA budget accounting and why the country continues to increase its military build-up of late, including the announcement of a Space Force.
A recent opinion piece in The New York Times argued “America has no reason to be so powerful” — but maybe it has.
And if technologies linked to the study of UFO’s fossil-free, anti-gravity propulsion can eventually be unveiled, then “clean energy” may become a reality. This is one overtly stated goal of TTSA, to leverage the study of UFOs to develop similar methods.
Swept away would be the damaging economies of fossil fuels. (Meaning behind the scenes a breakthrough may have already been made.) General Motors has also recently announced a dramatic shift away from petrol and diesel vehicles.
Naturally, the TTSA books don’t mention any geopolitical benefits tied to disclosure. They simply say it’s getting too hard to keep a secret these days. So, it’s time. That’s it.
Separately, TTSA’s Luis Elizondo expressed his view of the timing, saying that not moving forward on disclosure “is just avoiding the inevitable.”
With a plan proceeding like a Swiss watch, microbial life elsewhere in our solar system might be announced first, as a stepping stone. We’re already seeing teases of that as well as an abundance of propaganda centred on the discoveries of exoplanets and the possibility of life on other worlds, including continual hints about Mars. Some conventional, others bolder.
But the bigger secret is “they,” whoever they are, (intelligent they) are already here.
For media owners and publishers leaned on by the defence and intelligence community to support a sweeping plan, their duty and priority is the survival of their country, not transparency to their readers, a hazy controversial line.
No doubt reporters, on the whole, are idealistic and committed to bringing whole truths to the people. For reasons unknown to them though, some of their reporting gets promoted, other stories get killed.
New York Times’ freelance journalists Ralph Blumenthal, Leslie Kean, and staffer Helene Cooper jointly wrote the ground-breaking 2017 story about the Pentagon’s secret study of UFOs.
By Kean’s admission, the reporting genesis was an unsolicited tip planted directly to her by TTSA.
Journalists then do what comes naturally.
They investigate the story and discover editorial support where previously there was none, right up the chain, all the way to the front page. They have become unwitting assets, appropriated into furthering a bigger picture goal, exposing threats, targeting China and religion, helping America in the march to a one-world paradigm.
When the green light is given, tips just fall into journalists’ laps and all the doors that were previously shut swing open.
It’s a reasonable conjecture that television shows that align with a U.S.-led narrative of ETs sculpting earth’s origin story are encouraged if not straight-up seeded, helping prepare the long road ahead.
Meaning plans are decades in the making.
One suspect television show is the long-running ‘Ancient Aliens,’ also on History, as is TTSA’s ‘Unidentified.’ (The cable network is owned by Hearst Communications and Disney, powerhouse companies utilised for U.S. propaganda interests throughout the 20th century.)
Some authors like Zecharia Sitchin with his ‘Earth Chronicles’ book series and Erich von Däniken with ‘Chariots of the Gods’ struck on these same themes in the 1960s and 70s.
If the ‘Ancient Aliens’ television show seeds fiction with a soupçon of truth then it plays its role. The popular programme has also been skilfully marketed to youth around a charismatic lead with his trademark vertical hair, Giorgio Tsoukalos.
But really, all that’s needed is the simple, repeating mantra of the show’s title burrowing into kids’ brains year after year as they transition into adults. (Now in its 16th season.)
The TTSA books often refer to that television show, even using the same terminology “ancient astronaut theorists” but want you to know that all other speculation has been close but misguided. Theirs is the gold standard, “Beyond speculation to certain knowledge.”
(The reveals in the books are framed as questions, not as statements, as in ‘Ancient Aliens.’)
The point of difference between the two is primarily the threat angle.
Beyond propaganda, any plans against potential threats and enemies include gathering information about them and putting out disinformation about yourself (counter-intelligence).
The U.S. performs these against any adversaries scoping them out. If these other beings are real, buzzing U.S. military installations, aircraft carriers, interfering with nuclear missiles, mapping terrain, destroying things, wouldn’t they be treated the same way?
Has this intelligence war been going on for 70 or 80 years at least, in secrecy?
And if “the others” or “the visitors” are going directly to the people, the U.S. would want to know what’s going on. Hard to achieve if the public has been shut out, shamed, gaslighted, and told it’s all a joke.
The amiable counter-intelligence expert Luis Elizondo has lately been in over-drive encouraging people to speak up, tell their stories, make themselves known, or contact him. He presents as a point man cheerleading the masses to help get this great truth revealed.
His assignment is more likely an American defence strategic battle.
A quick multiple choice quiz. His original TTSA title was:
(a) Dallas Cowboys’ Cheerleader
(b) Director of Global Security
A trojan horse that TTSA is promoting is a yet to be released data acquisition app called ‘Scout’ which will have a public interface. Quietly sitting behind Scout will be an analytical, artificial-intelligence supercomputer behemoth called ‘The Vault.’
In ‘TTSA Talks,’ a podcast series produced by the company, the first three episodes are dedicated to their plans for worldwide data acquisition, data crunching, and predictive analysis centred on the phenomenon.
On the podcast, Tom DeLonge outlines collecting and feeding in all manner of data; stories from people’s experiences, including structured and unstructured American and international databases, ingesting religious and philosophical texts, archaeological information, then spitting out at the other end patterns that can be predictive and related to humanity’s grand story.
At least, the story that they want you to hear.
I’ll give you a hint. TTSA already know the story they’re going to spin from the data because they’re already spinning it. What they do with the data internally is another matter.
DeLonge says there will be a global push to encourage “contactees” and “experiencers” to come out of the shadows and share their stories within the app.
But according to DeLonge, the database will ingest both highly classified as well as unclassified data. That means part of the system will be walled off, deeply connected, and accessed by the U.S. intelligence community, serving U.S. national security.
Now you might think that “contactees” and “experiencers” sounds like the stuff of make-believe, myth, or insanity, but the U.S. has long been curious in them.
TTSA and precursor Defense Intelligence Agency contractors have previously attempted to buy into large public databases associated with UFO groups to access witness details and information.
MUFON, globally the largest civilian group cataloguing and researching UFOs previously attracted the interest of Robert Bigelow’s team. Recently TTSA attempted unsuccessfully to purchase the database of the FREE organisation who in 2018 published the results of a four-year survey of over 3,200 people from more than 100 countries.
(By the way, the FREE results found that around 95% of those who claim interaction with the phenomenon view the experience as positive or neutral. Not terrifying and soul-sucking.)
Individuals who experience strange events seem to enter into their own intimate, ephemeral, very private inward journey of faith and belief, about what is real, and what is not. They’re encouraged to journey and find meaning within, rather than seeking power, status, validation, or “truth” externally.
If the phenomenon is on a mission to help humanity evolve, as many claim, this may be a key aspect.
Harvard Professor of Psychiatry, the late John E. Mack, studied specifically experiencers and the UFO phenomenon. In analysing its effects on humans’ psyche, Mack spoke many times about how it challenges our very culture and our view of ourselves.
Those who experience inexplicable UFO phenomena often become reverent of all life, develop greater empathy, spirituality, and a belief in oneness.
In the UFO field of study, there’s also a rich history of charlatans and opportunists, and roughly 90% of UFO reports are said to be bugs, seagulls, stars, meteorites, hoaxes, Venus, swamp gas, imagination, or misidentified natural occurrences, like the glowing eyes of your neighbour’s cat on the roof.
DeLonge doesn’t care, he says their government-aligned supercomputer will sort out the wheat from the chaff.
There have always been credible witnesses, often professionally trained observers, pilots, radar returns, telemetry, and physical evidence. And as we’re being told, the U.S. military has collected irrefutable evidence as well.
One notable civilian contactee is Chris Bledsoe, somewhat well known in UFO circles who has become a darling of both TTSA, NASA, and the intelligence agencies. It’s not hard to see why.
Part of Bledsoe’s story involves witnessing UFOs, orbs, miraculous healings, visitations by an etheric “white lady” who advises him, as well as a tree that inexplicably burned in his yard.
It’s not too much of a stretch to imagine the multi-million-dollar TTSA super computer agonisingly crunching the data for weeks and finally presenting a connection between Moses, his burning bush, and an angel. I humbly offer that because this author’s brain is just as capable of pattern recognition as a supercomputer and it only took me a few seconds for a fraction of the cost.
Also, I saw (and I don’t know if the computer saw) ‘Earth vs The Flying Saucers’ (1956) with the opening line, “Since biblical times, man has witnessed and recorded strange manifestations in the sky.”
Dangling big dollars, TTSA attempted to purchase Bledsoe’s story for a motion picture, but Bledsoe refused, not wanting his experiences misinterpreted.
The official courting of Bledsoe is obvious.
The southerner currently views his encounters as profoundly religious, calling out “Thank you Lord” when they manifest on video. He insists God is real and so are angels. If he’s eventually swung, he’s the perfect ambassador, right in TTSA’s re-interpreting religion wheelhouse, especially targeting those U.S. red states.
Multiple witnesses in credible close encounter UFO cases, including Bledsoe, talk openly of being approached by government scientists wanting DNA samples and MRI scans, interested in the morphology of their mind and body, attempting to discover if they were affected by the encounter, or already possessed physiological predispositions.
Why do certain individuals experience anomalous events or are “contacted?”
Is it their biology, DNA, their nature, their psychology, their beliefs? Are there patterns that can be predicted? Is there actionable intel that can be gleaned from them? Does it concern the future of humanity, or is it simply random, imagined, or craziness?
When the very blue-chip The New York Times broke their story in December 2017 about the Pentagon secretly studying UFOs, a sentence also confirmed that “Researchers also studied people who said they had experienced physical effects from encounters with the objects and examined them for any physiological changes.”
The U.S. government and their defence intelligence agencies have been into this for decades. This is not just the stuff of supermarket tabloids or science fiction.
A famous U.K case from December 1980 which occurred in Rendelsham Forest, just outside the joint U.S. and British military bases of R.A.F. Woodbridge had personnel who experienced UFO close encounters.
One of them, John Burroughs, would fight for over thirty years to get disability payment assistance, even just transparent access to his classified medical records, to justify injuries based on exposure which he finally achieved.
The government had stalled because the broader implication was their acceptance would signal the encounter was real.
Burroughs was also approached for DNA sampling and a brain MRI.
In 2019, several security guards went public and raised concerns about unusual terms of employment. A decade ago they were hired by U.S. contractor Robert Bigelow, financed through the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency. They patrolled ‘Skinwalker Ranch’ a notorious paranormal hotspot in Utah, and were expected to undergo brain scanning and medical sampling as part of being stationed on the ranch.
The guards wanted answers. Were they were recruited to act as security, or as laboratory guinea pigs?
You can’t fault the USA for trying to match wits with the phenomenon.
Though you’d expect that if it can run rings around U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets, it’s likely to run rings around the CIA with counter-intelligence too, including making it impossible to decipher exactly who they are or what is their agenda.
TTSA talk openly about studying UFOs and advances in manipulating space and time as if it’s limited to propulsion and free energy. What’s patently more obvious is how manipulating space and time would be of use in intelligence gathering.
If these “others” can do that, and also get inside people’s heads, then they can prove every detail of what the U.S., Russia, China, whomever, has done and they also know what they’re going to do.
They would know all their secrets.
This alone should give superpowers pause about getting into the fiction business.
Nevertheless, as ridiculously hopeless as it is, once the TTSA supercomputer analyses the mountains of data, some innocent witnesses who have come forward with their story might be identified as worthy of further study or interrogation. Those people might be the subject of interest for medical testing and deep profiling, perhaps unwittingly.
Who knows, they might get categorised as a “domestic terrorist” for their evil alien consorting.
It’s also fair and reasonable to speculate that the “fun” advertising push over the last few decades for people worldwide to send in their DNA for genealogy analysis might be submitting their most precious personal fingerprint to companies in some way associated with intelligence agencies.
That may sound utterly fantastic, but if part of this chess game involves who we really are as a species, where we came from, and what’s going on, then that information is hot property. The infamous “Golden State Killer” was recently captured after eluding police for decades when commercial companies’ DNA records were accessed, matching crime scene evidence to the code of relatives who had used the system.
The second TTSA book ‘Man’ spends an inordinate amount of time obsessed with DNA, blood, and how central and critical they are to understanding humanity’s past and how those evil aliens ferreted in there with their little home-shopping-network gene splicers and sabotaged us.
If an argument for national security, planetary security, or survival of the species is involved, then privacy and human rights is the first thing thrown out the window.
If defence intelligence agencies were already all over the human genome project like molluscs, which they should have been, then getting a snapshot of millions or billions of people’s DNA is a no-brainer. TTSA’s book ‘Man’ gives a free plug specifically to Ancestry.com which must rate alongside History.com as the crème de la crème of domain name ownership.
Up to now, as far as the public has been concerned, if otherworldly visitors existed they’ve been viewed as benevolent, neutral, or hostile depending on mainly subjective interpretation. There’s fair evidence to suggest they’re whatever you believe them to be.
(That’s next-generation counter-intelligence.)
A question to ponder in your own spare time: as a species technologically advances, does it also ethically advance?
The TTSA threat angle can not only be traced back to old science fiction movies, it also goes back to Lieutenant Phillip J. Corso’s 1997 book, ‘The Day After Roswell,’ written the year before he died.
If it’s true that certain truths get seeded into public consciousness well ahead of time, then this book certainly qualifies.
It has to be said that Corso had a credible, even illustrious intelligence background spanning World War II, the Korean War, the Eisenhower White House, the Pentagon, and on Capitol Hill.
Fiercely patriotic, Corso writes in great detail about the politics of the UFO coverup and how he and his ex-boss and mentor the legendary Lt. Gen. Arthur G. Trudeau were intricately involved in the late 1950s and early 1960s. According to Corso’s account, they navigated the secrecy together and “helped to change the course of history.”
Corso idolised Trudeau, saying, “He was a man of great courage… the most brilliant man I have ever known… Any success I had I attribute to him and to his leadership.”
The book is dedicated to the late Trudeau and also, as Corso often said, was written for his own grandchildren. The repeating ethos in the book of dead-straight honour makes it problematic to believe Corso would do the opposite, fabricate such a densely detailed sham, specifically as an embarrassing legacy not only for his family but the family of his idol.
But irresepective of whether Corso is telling the truth or not, a key issue is that his ET threat narrative re-emerges in TTSA’s version today.
Corso describes his interpretation of a species that’s become commonly depicted in culture as the little greys: “These creatures weren’t benevolent alien beings who had come to enlighten human beings. They were genetically altered humanoid automatons, cloned biological entities, actually, who were harvesting biological specimens on Earth for their own experimentation.”
Perhaps this is why some have forecast the merging of humanity with technology as the inevitable evolution to trans-humanism. Also realistically why it was thought humanity back in the 1940s couldn’t handle that reveal.
I guess if I was one particular ET species of advanced biological artificial intelligence, I might need that mysterious thing called consciousness from the building blocks of sperm and ovum, to augment new creations. Is that soul-sucking?
When it comes to the word “harvesting,” prepare too for more publicity eventually on cattle mutilations and alleged human abductions. On TTSA’s television show ‘Unidentified,’ in their recently concluded second season, they began to broach the concept of abductions.
And it wasn’t the Chinese or the Russians.
Not only does Corso talk about DNA manipulation, but he also says disclosure of the ET reality to the wider public will happen when the USA has developed space weapons at a level to reassure the world that they can defend the planet. In 1997 Corso said they had done so and the ET issue was the major reason for President Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ initiative of global space defence.
DeLonge has echoed that same line.
Recent reports in The New York Times on UFOs have also started to hint at past crash retrievals. If you can claim to shoot UFOs down, you can claim to be able to defend the Earth.
And only the USA can believably market to the world full-spectrum global defence.
In the drip-feed reveal, there’s also logic behind the first reports from The New York Times referring to UFO incidents out over oceans. It’s further away and less confronting than a disc hovering over your house about to snatch and harvest you. But it also ties to an emerging narrative of alien presences (and weapons) being under our oceans.
TTSA has flagged that people (that’s you) will have to accept that the phenomenon is unsettling and much more threatening than anyone can imagine. (How’s your imagination?)
Given we’re already being told UFOs are real, how will the disturbing threat angle be “proven?”
Some might accept it if there were ray guns and octopus aliens chasing them down the street, trying to eat their head, and steal their soul. I’m not sure about octopus aliens or soul-sucking, as much as I’d love to see an octopus running down a street, as long as it’s not gaining on me.
Many in ufology have long predicted that the U.S. is planning a “false-flag” attack, carrying it out themselves and framing benevolent (or even non-existent) aliens as the villains.
If the U.S. needs to prove to the world that ET is the new/old threat, then it’s certainly possible they will link to an event that has already occurred. This matches the strategy of imagery and terror already seeded in people’s minds.
Has TTSA, the History Channel, their partners, been dropping visual and verbal clues that cross-pollinate, whilst looking at their watches, waiting for people to pick up and run with them?
Yes, they have.
If we arrange the jigsaw, there’s a very obvious event that does line up. And the U.S. can come out of it with all their boxes ticked.
Even TTSA’s Christopher Mellon, who chooses his words meticulously and methodically, mentioned this event on a FOX News interview, saying catastrophes like this happen when agencies don’t share information.
And when Luis Elizondo’s Pentagon resignation letter was “leaked,” it revealed that his last position was not involved with UFOs, but the Director of a secretive unit intertwined with this other tragedy.
It’s now time to remember that final first-season episode of TTSA’s television show ‘Unidentified’ and what we were told in ‘The Revelation.’
Here ETs shoot electro-magnetic, directed energy weapons, just off-shore from under the ocean. A by-product of these weapons is that they are capable of igniting random “spontaneous fires” in surrounding areas. Specifically highlighted is an event in a seaside town, Canneto di Caronia, in Sicily in 2004. (The much-publicised U.S. Navy “Tic-Tac” UFO incident of the same year also highlighted a possible craft just under the surface of the ocean.)
Add to that History channel’s YouTube page recently promoting an oddball segment from a 2014 ‘Ancient Aliens’ episode. The clip implies that extra-terrestrials have the technology for weather control and the example given was a hurricane that materialised out of nowhere off the east coast of the U.S. and thwarted the British army as they attempted to take Washington D.C. in 1814.
In this clip, the narrator suggests ETs don’t mind influencing significant world events and will nonchalantly throw a hurricane into the mix.
Have we seen real-life claims of directed energy weapons, religious based terror attacks, spontaneous fires, hurricanes off the east coast of the USA, and horrific tragedy, all in one standalone event? One where the U.S. appears to be moving to some form of acknowledgement?
An acknowledgement where America can still claim to be the victim and not the villain? And that it was partially covered-up because it was all too confronting?
Please make sure your seat belt is fastened tightly. If an oxygen mask drops down, attach it before you pass out.
As Rod Serling once said, “You’re travelling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That’s the signpost up ahead
— your next stop, the Twilight Zone.”
In 2001, two 110 storey skyscrapers in lower Manhattan disintegrated in 10 seconds each with everyone witnessing exactly where they went. They were turned to dust in a way humans have never before witnessed.
“There is surprisingly so little rubble. Where did all the rubble go?” asked legendary ABC news anchor Peter Jennings to reporter George Stephanopoulos who was at the site 24hrs after the collapses. “It’s a very good question Peter,” Stephanopoulos agreed. Where was all the mass? The best he could offer was that a volunteer had informed him, “All of it simply fell down. Into the ground and was pulverized, evaporated.”
A term would soon become synonymous with that event: “weapons of mass destruction.”
A former professor of mechanical engineering, Dr. Judy Wood, in her 2010 book ‘Where Did The Towers Go?’ attempted to address that very question.
She presents a compelling analysis of clues and evidence from that event.
Her hypothesis is that some form of directed energy weapon “dustified” eleven floors per second.
Newtonian era physics, circa 17th Century, says it’s impossible for a gravity collapse to produce what the human eye witnessed, reinforced steel skyscrapers constructed around a solid core turning to dust top to bottom near the speed of free-fall.
Wood’s evidence also highlights cars, trucks, and buses bursting into highly bizarre “spontaneous fires” (the same terminology TTSA chose to mirror) in more distant parking lots and on streets, which are secondary symptoms of directed energy that’s been reproduced in experiments.
But that’s not all.
In early September 2001, there had been a tropical storm in the Atlantic that was fizzling out. Instead, on September 7 it regathered itself into a hurricane and made a bee-line straight for Manhattan. In a first, NASA organised advanced probes to dive into the eye to investigate, mapping the structure in three dimensions to gain further intelligence.
Several TV breakfast shows early on the morning of September 11 omitted the hurricane from their weather maps but a satellite photo from that afternoon is stark. Hurricane Erin should have led to New York City warnings.
Eventually, as the events in Manhattan and Washington D.C. ended, the hurricane made a rare 135 degree turn away from the coast and went away.
That tragic day aligns thematically with TTSA’s narrative; humans manipulated to carry out terror attacks with a religious slant, tied inexorably to conflicts in the Middle East and specifically Islam. That event launched a “war on terror,” implying Islam was a religion prone to produce violence.
It’s also an event where people have been discouraged from asking too many questions, mass conditioned to auto-ridicule and gaslight those who do, in line with how UFO secrecy has traditionally been run.
Anyone who has raised questions has been socially shamed as a “conspiracy theorist.”
What apparently does not qualify as a conspiracy is that a group of international amateurs coordinated a highly complex scheme to enter the U.S., train for, then hijacked four commercial jetliners and flew them skillfully into buildings.
From a location standpoint, The New York Times recently ran an article that located persistent UFOs from 2013–15 buzzing around U.S. Navy battle groups off the coast of Virginia, close enough to Manhattan and of course Washington D.C.
A navy pilot had previously referenced “there’s a whole fleet of them.”
This area is also the location of the Hudson Canyon, “the largest known ocean canyon off the east coast of the United States, and one of the largest submarine canyons in the world.”
Even George Stephanopoulos was back in the mix when he interviewed President Donald Trump in 2019. Out of nowhere Trump said, “And, by the way, Iraq did not knock down the World Trade Center. It was not Iraq. It were other people. And I think I know who the other people were. And you might also.”
99 out of 100 journalists might have asked the obvious follow-up, but the vastly experienced Stephanopoulos let it slide.
Earlier in the day Stephanopoulos had thrown a curve-ball of his own at Trump, asking him to reveal what he knew about UFOs, which Trump had batted away.
Investigators into the 9/11 event have long claimed the evidence doesn’t add up. The co-chairs of the official 9/11 Commission Report stated that they believed their investigation had been deliberately “set-up to fail” and that they encountered inexplicable obfuscation and lies from multiple official agencies.
Just in case you’re now convinced aliens joined in and “dustified” two skyscrapers, they don’t own the patent to directed energy weapons.
Nikola Tesla introduced the concept to humans in the late 19th century. Unless ET slipped the plans under his doormat first.
Tesla once stated it’d be possible to bring The Empire State Building down. He said, “Vibration will do anything. It would only be necessary to step up the vibrations of the machine to fit the natural vibration of the building and the building would come crashing down.”
Tesla also claimed his experiments with electro-magnetism demonstrated it would be possible to create a particle beam weapon drawing power from the ionosphere. On September 11, monitoring stations across the U.S. recorded fluctuations in the earth’s magnetic field that are debatably significant.
In the Sicilian case of spontaneous fires mentioned earlier, which TTSA chose to highlight in their television show ‘Unidentified,’ a government formed investigation reported “anomalous electromagnetic activity.” Also included in the show were photos of metal melted away or vaporised.
If there’s further government revelations about 9/11, it won’t be that the USA is the villain, or that the home team cheated. That’s something the average American will not accept.
On the contrary, it has to be that the USA was then, and has been since, heroic.
Is the inevitability that 9/11 can’t be deflected forever — and the momentum around UFO disclosure connected?
Indeed, a question for Luis Elizondo would be his opinion on why the U.S. has found every excuse imaginable to delay the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (alleged 9/11 mastermind) for close to 15 years? Is it that any conviction will damage the credibility of the justice system if the government is eventually seen to have knowingly withheld information whilst prosecuting?
What’s still suppressed in establishment media is that significant momentum has grown over the last 5 years via activist groups litigating on multiple fronts demanding answers to the vast problems in the official September 11 story. (Intelligence agencies are smart enough to be active in both the official as well as the activist narratives.)
Included in the momentum is the establishment of a Grand Jury in New York, court cases compelling more information about that to be made public, the suggestion the government is stalling, a second Grand Jury being petitioned, court demands for a new inquest in the U.K. by victims’ family members, and ultimately a development that is the most significant of all.
In 2020 a four year, highly technical engineering study by Dr. Leroy Hulsey and his team based at the University of Alaska Fairbanks established beyond any scientific doubt that a fire-induced, free-fall, gravity collapse of a third building, not hit by any airplane, 47 storey World Trade Centre 7, was impossible unless it was assisted.
As a line from ‘Seven,’ a recently released documentary on the topic says, “If there’s a problem with the collapse of Building 7, there’s a problem with 9/11.”
Curiously, to the naked eye, the collapse of Building 7 differs from the first two, appearing far more conventional. Two contrasting methods of destruction may have occurred that day and a new narrative, exonerating the U.S., can explain that. Especially if an anonymous structure stacked with national security sensitivities was suddenly compromised and in a war zone — and had to be brought down.
Now, as I promised at the start, just when you thought this cannot get any more assaulting and bizarre, it does. ‘Hot Nazi Homos’ is being de-throned.
Here’s where your oxygen mask drops down.
If that U.S. disaster in September 2001 is linked to true “weapons of mass destruction,” including what the U.S. is rolling out now about the genesis of our species, then the highly contentious invasion of Iraq that followed may have relevance.
At the time of 9/11, there was no instantly identifiable villain nation. 15 of the hijackers were Saudi citizens, a country which is a transactional ally with America, especially as a major customer for military sales.
The world then witnessed the U.S. promote a quite extraordinary demonising of Iraq, not on the basis that they had committed this crime, but that they might become capable in the future of doing something similar.
On-point with TTSA’s earth-origin narrative today, is that within Iraq sits a cradle of humanity, ancient archaeological sites and relics, DNA, including the Sumerians and possibly the Nephilim giants, which are under the microscope in the TTSA books.
A by-product of invading Iraq would be that the U.S. seized control of “evidence” in that part of the world. Yes, shameless other professional piracy and looting of money and resources also occurred.
If the U.S. today is publically open and obsessed with humanity’s history, (Mesopotamia’s history), then by using force they manufactured unfettered access post September 2001.
What is the truth? For now, it’s just clues, jigsaws, and hypotheticals.
Let’s exit the Twilight Zone.
Pick yourself up off the floor, get your head back on straight, give it a shake, remove the oxygen mask and keep concentrating. If your dog, cat, or horse is not making eye contact with you you’ll have to explain later.
In all honesty, all they’re thinking about right now is being fed.
There’s a sizeable catch to all this fearmongering, the message that another species are the bad guys.
It’s more than exploiting a UFO narrative as a threat, a false-flag event, a geopolitical strategy, gathering people’s stories, and cramming a supercomputer with a heavy diet of data. It’s more than ray guns disintegrating buildings and both sides pointing at one another.
One side claiming “There’s the villain!” And the other side saying, “No, we’re being framed!”
It’s more than burning bushes and angelic creatures and religious mythologies that need re-writing.
The devil is in the detail and it’s the most pertinent thing to the survival of not only the United States but the human race.
There is an ultimate threat, but it’s not a physical threat.
The threat of ET is ideological.
In the 1997 movie ‘Contact’ a movie about the first conversation between humanity and an advanced alien species, the character of the eccentric billionaire S. R. Hadden (played by John Hurt) expresses it most eloquently when he says, “The powers that be have been very busy lately. Falling over each other to position themselves in the game of the millennium.”
Humans can’t help it.
Homo sapiens sapiens specialise in strategising to attain more power, influence and status, more money, more awards, more “followers,” more “likes,” more attributions, and crying like babies when they suspect their credit has been stolen. (It was.)
Fear, survival of the fittest, fight or flight, and competition have been the dominant drivers in human evolution. It’s simple to understand why it began that way. But over time, it’s as if we missed an off-ramp that more advanced species saw, valued, and took.
In records of contact, channelling, visions, visitation, over and over it’s clear that advanced intelligences if they indeed exist, do not view existence through our same lens of perception.
One notable event was a mass sighting of a craft by over 60 children at the Ariel School in Zimbabwe in 1994. A few innocent and stunned little girls encountered a being close up and mentally perceived a message of the inherent dangers of our rapid technological advancement tied to impending habitat and species collapse.
The perilous technological advancement may very well be our accelerated ways of communication — tied to our addiction to compete.
Now, because of the evolution of social media, and the rapid spread of opinions tethered to competition, both the people disseminating information and the people receiving it have become progressively more and more combative and suspicious.
Distortion and disinformation have always been weapons to gain a competitive advantage.
Mainly this was the domain of high-level espionage, or advertising cigarettes, but now it’s spread everywhere. People aren’t believing what governments, the media, big tech, or even qualified experts tell them anymore.
Everything is disputed.
This escalation of two-way paranoia, based on the terror of losing competitive advantage is compounding and has dire ramifications.
What’s been eroded is a human being’s simple, innocent right to know what’s real in their world.
In a worst-case scenario, it may be that a technological species addicted to competition can become progressively unable to verify, share and widely accept knowledge critical to survival.
The USA and other nations see the obvious need to crack down on social media platforms and the content on them, trying to curate, censor or reclaim their position as arbiters of sanctioned, absolute “truth.”
But the genie is out of the bottle, and the consequences are immense.
Reflected more and more in western media these days, there’s a steady shift away from true reporting to a presentation and reinforcement of a specific narrative. This very much resembles what we would ordinarily accuse North Korea, Russia, Iran, or China of doing.
That’s because democracy runs on the will and belief of the people. Control belief, you control a democracy. With too many voices, democracy can be de-stabilised and theoretically brought down, something enemies have realised in spreading disinformation via social media.
As a defence, software algorithms can be tweaked to make destabilising or dangerous opinions disappear in searches, or you can be kicked off and silenced even if you’re a U.S. president.
But an eventual solution won’t be doubling-down on control.
It’s not greater manipulation and restrictions on information, although the superpowers might beg to differ. Nor is it the re-establishment of a paradigm of accepted experts. Protecting status, or other agendas, have become such imperatives it means “experts” can easily be dissuaded or remain silent on truly sensitive issues that would benefit humanity.
We’ve been on the internal combustion engine for 150 years. Where’s that “expert” who could have brought the world a different energy solution 50 or 75 years ago?
Our species does not share knowledge openly, flowing organically in the shortest possible time, towards wellbeing as a whole.
Our dominant behaviour, that of competition, is paramount and at some point must end for us to survive.
Hardly anyone wants to hear or accept that because our insecurities are so hard-wired. It’s like telling people they will have to transition from breathing oxygen to breathing ammonia.
At the root though, it’s establishing a new relationship with fear.
U.S. strategists already know the UFO issue is a type of ideological war as they launch a propaganda campaign.
But in doing so they rely on the old tropes, fear, and a paradigm of power and competition. More importantly, it’s us against them. As President George W. Bush said in 2001, “You’re either with us, or against us… ”
“We’re not a humanitarian assistance organisation,” says original TTSA rebel humanitarian, Luis Elizondo. It’s a revealing slip, also saying we and not they when referring to the Department of Defense, an institution from which he’s purportedly separate. “When you look at what the job is of the Department of Defense, it is to very quickly identify and neutralize a potential adversary.”
As sad as it is, human beings, on the whole, are not in the humanitarian business either.
If we’re thinking of exporting our culture out into the cosmos, then we’re the threat.
Paradoxically, if you’re against the ways of humans, you may be for the survival of our species.
In a way, the current global pandemic highlights some of the differences of a me-first culture versus we need to work together; not as competitors, but as a global community concentrating on the wellbeing of all humanity.
Astronaut, the late Edgar Mitchell again: “… it’s becoming very clear that the way we have conducted ourselves as stewards of life on planet earth is wanting. We haven’t been good stewards. We have environmental and global problems right now that are bringing civilisation to a crisis. And people don’t want to hear that but it’s slowly becoming obvious. But then it’s true. This knowledge, who we are, how we manage a planet, how we fit into the larger scheme of things is a very important question.”
If America is keen on re-booting the fallen angel narrative then they’ll have to be careful because Lucifer was the champion of a me-first, selfish, personal pleasure and aggrandisement mindset.
What patriotic country do you think is the gold standard flag bearer of individual exceptionalism, rising to the top, status, power, fame, competition, “followers,” “likes,” as a mark of a life well-lived?
This is not a capitalism vs communism thing, or democracies versus autocracies, although on the surface those dead-end decisions seem to be the only choice. The west loves capitalism because it champions personal freedom and survival of the fittest if you get up off your rear and show initiative. It understandably hates communism because totalitarianism demands conformity, it stifles and corrals the individual.
But the west’s version of freedom, now via surveillance, control, censorship, and technology, is progressively heading towards a version of dystopian totalitarianism as well. Included in that is trans-humanism, where everyone is plugged into and monitored by machines.
In 1776 America was right in hitting upon ideals of freedom and egalitarianism. Freedom might be the law of nature.
But in human rights, it’s always been hierarchal, disputed, and controlled freedom. The USA also grew up on the foundations of slavery, racism, and a patriarchal society.
The survival of humanity is all about human rights and individual freedoms evolving.
Our current iteration of freedom needs to be upgraded to Version 2.
The phenomenon invites humans to view reality differently and we’ve yet to realise that we need to RSVP. This is not viewing economics, politics, or religion differently, this is viewing reality differently.
Humanity once believed the world was flat. The revelation that the surface curved and the planet was round changed the game, even though the clues had been right in front of our eyes forever.
What’s coming has to be a similar shift to save our species.
How can that happen? What would it take?
Evidence from people experiencing the phenomenon provides some clues, a few incidents resemble humanity being poked with a stick to wake up.
For instance, numerous reports highlight someone observing a UFO, yet another person doesn’t see it, or sees it differently.
A terrific example of this occurred in 1950, three sailors on the same ship off the coast of New York. This short video reconstructing the event, simply and elegantly describes what happened.
This incident raises an obvious question.
If each sailor had been holding a measuring device, or instrument, what would have been recorded by each witness?
The answer may have profound ramifications for scientific materialism and reality as we know it.
Starting in 1967, Dorothy Wilkinson-Izatt claimed she would frequently see supernatural orbs and began filming them with an 8mm home movie camera. She captured the results on celluloid. Astronomer Dr. J Allen Hynek, he of the Air Force’s Project Bluebook UFO investigation, was intrigued and suggested wisely that she try a different camera, just in case it was a mechanical aberration.
Dorothy sourced another camera and still recorded orbs. On some days, people who were with her would see them, other times not. Corroborating witnesses meant Dorothy wasn’t imprinting them on celluloid via some private mental powers.
She was seeing them. And a machine was seeing them.
It was decided to test someone else filming alongside Dorothy.
Dorothy filmed with one camera and a friend standing next to her filmed with another. Dorothy saw orbs, and her machine recorded them. The friend (and her machine) did not. This even happened with television crews who followed Dorothy at a later date.
The many details of Izatt’s experiences are unsolved.
In historical accounts, it’s very well established that the phenomenon appears uninterested in playing by the rules of scientific reductionism. That is, results being reliably reproduced in controlled experiments, monitored by machines, to prove an objective reality.
These days, we rely so much on scientific materialism that anything that cannot be proven is “unfalsifiable” and “unscientific” — thus dismissed.
The majority of scientists ignore the phenomenon, deny its existence, treat it as a joke, or conclude that any report must have been made by an idiot, or easily explained by something simpler — repeatable and measurable.
But maybe the fact that the phenomenon is at times unfalsifiable, and thus “unscientific” by our current standard may be the point, not a disqualifying factor.
Scientists also, on the whole, believe that objective reality is primal, and consciousness has been born out of matter, rather than the other way around.
But if consciousness is primal, came first, can it be that we’re being given clues that our accepted way (pointing a machine at something and measuring it) is limited?
The phenomenon may be a missing part of the jigsaw of understanding our existence.
Eventually, if it’s confirmed that machines can record conflicting results from what should be a finite thing, then scientific materialism has reached a natural roadblock. Machines then could not be relied upon to be the authorities on what is real and what is not.
Where it concerns the evolution of freedom and human rights, it may be that the shift is to a more subjective individual reality, possibly a further extension of Einstein’s relativity principle.
We’re told by Einstein that time is relative, and different interpretations of time are dependent on speed. Today, what we think is consensus or objective reality might be relative as well — varied not by speed, but by your consciousness interacting with a malleable fabric.
Machines and instruments currently have no true consciousness, and consciousness (including pure math) seems to be able to relocate and explore different realities.
Here again, a valid reason why any hybrid biological-machine alien may want to harvest sperm and eggs, mainly for consciousness. It could also be used to integrate into their transport. It’s a passport out of one locked-in reality.
It may also suggest that no matter how advanced our artificial intelligence becomes, even if it becomes self-aware, true consciousness will elude it.
Our concept of personal freedom today may be in a process of radical expansion by which everyone is an explorer and co-creator of their destiny.
It may mean that a cycle of materialism, intense jealousy, competition, threats, and objective reductionism comes to an end.
It may not be just one road and one competitive game. I’ll write at a later time about my theory of fate, destiny and free-will all co-existing.
Previously I wrote how telepathy is also a natural evolution of human rights.
The UFO issue is not a physical threat, it’s an ideological threat, especially to the most powerful countries on earth. If world culture truly changes, it may also mean that America as we know it, as a nationalistic superpower, seeking “full-spectrum dominance” over the planet, ceases to be.
It’s the quintessential test.
Can humanity as a whole be put ahead of two-dimensional personal and national interests?
As of now, we don’t know.
By December 22, 2020, it appeared TTSA was shapeshifting in appearance yet again. Three key personnel, Mellon, Elizondo, and Steve Justice allegedly left the company and the future mission of it became clouded, revamped, or even terminated.
Elizondo referred to his departure as “mission accomplished,” now moving into what he described as “second gear.”
According to the accounts of contactees, the pathway through the gears is extremely clear.
It’s in the messages from “the others” today. It has been for decades, and it’s been prophesied for millennia in those ancient religious texts that Tom DeLonge says he’s so desperate to shovel down that supercomputer’s throat, like he’s feeding the boilers on the Titanic.
That ship also sunk.
Religious masters of all faiths espouse a foundation of love and humility to build a life around. The ultimate goal is not pampering of insecure egos and a quest for personal aggrandisement. Contentment and peace exist in the flow of a deep connection to all things.
Others’ successes are your successes, others’ failures your failures.
Giving hope to most people, including powerful countries, Arthur M. Young, (well known to the American intelligence community), once said that it’s only worth sacrificing the ego if one has developed an ego worth sacrificing.
Allegedly warring religions long ago prophesied who is left standing when crunch time arrives.
The Christians know it as “Blessed are the meek (the humble or gentle) for they shall inherit the earth. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.”
Muslims know it as “Allah has revealed to me that you must be humble towards one another, so that no one wrongs another or arrogantly boasts to another. We have already written in the book after the remembrance that My righteous servants will inherit the earth.”
Judaism prophesises that “… the humble shall inherit the land and delight themselves in abundant peace.”
This doesn’t sound like evil ancient aliens setting people against one another.
It sounds like humans haven’t been listening.
Stretching back before monotheistic religions, the longest continual creation tradition on the planet is said to be the Australian aboriginal mythology of the rainbow serpent. It represents through its many colours the integration and acceptance of not only humans of all skin hues, but tranquillity achieved via intimate reverence and symbiosis with everything.
Surprisingly, Australian aborigines have their own UFO lore of sky travellers possessing vastly superior technology to the white man. These visitors don’t seek to colonise them, terrorise or abduct them, but instead respect their integration with the ecosystem, they leave them alone.
Competitive realists say that oneness is all kumbaya idealism and not possible in the real world. That’s why it will take a different view of reality to upend them. One where both individual freedom and oneness can co-exist and flourish.
This seems paradoxical and impossible, but it can be.
In the early 20th century, classical physicists had the whole floor pulled out from under them when they discovered quantum mechanics. The double-slit experiment and the “observer effect” implied profound ramifications for reality and the role of consciousness.
It’s also a seminal example of a machine recording two different results.
The objective, physical world, and a subjective, spiritual or parapsychological world, became indistinguishable.
It challenged physicists to contemplate the very nature of who we are. Albert Einstein in particular had great problems accepting, and never did fully accept, the implications of quantum mechanics. Conversely, centuries before, Sir Isaac Newton kept quieter his passion for alchemy and his thoughts that reality was somehow magical.
When quantum physics was discovered, our species did not bound away like curious kids through this new doorway or off-ramp that welcomed all humanity.
All the ways to keep the majority of people disempowered and on one single, controlled highway, were more important.
If individual freedoms and human rights can be amplified in a new way, through a new view of reality, where the fear impulse for self-advancement and self-protection against competitors melts, then that will be some thing.
It will not only be a new relationship with fear but also how to survive and flourish together as one, us initiated into cosmic adulthood.
Who will tell us our origin story?
Will it continue out of Langley Virginia with the CIA disseminating their objectives via a hierarchy of “credible” media partners, working on that pyramid-shaped paradigm of fear, competition, threats, and enemies?
Or will it arrive from those who have been around longer than us?
Are there those who don’t equate truth with popularity contests, who can’t be bought and aren’t controlled or scared by social shaming or ridicule, and aren’t obsessed with curating their status or inflating their ego? Will it be from beings who don’t fall over one another to position themselves, have no followers on social media, no subscribers, not one “like” or even one “view”?
Will we discover new humanity and transformational leadership within everyone? Will we not remake the past but remake ourselves and our world?
The ancients had a far more spiritual and organic connection to the habitat and the cosmos. If we are fortunate we may be heading back to where we originated.
The poet T.S. Eliot once wrote:
“We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.”
I wonder if that TTSA artificial intelligence machine, after all the grinding and crunching of data, will have the chops to tell its superpower overlords its only conclusion?
“You must let go of America as you know it. If not, your species will cease to be.”
The computer might blink, then spit out one last message:
“Take your pick.”
